home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1123 / 1123r003.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  53KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: OUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the court of appeals after reviewing the relevant facts and the objections of Petitioner non pary abuse tts discretion in vacating the district court judgments the joint application the parties after the case had become moot following an am length settlement? Did the court of appeals correctly hold that Petitioner non party , paq no standing oppose the joint motion parties vacate the judgments below where the non party deliberately chose not litigate own ctaims the trial court. was seeking assert obiections of indemnitee being pons another court and (iii) intentionally waited to assert those objections until after the parties settlernent had been fully consummated, the risk of reversal avoided, and Petitioner's financial Insodxa to its indemnitee 11 this case cpa ...